MamaGravity good back-story, and good acting

Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.

Roman Sampson One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Platypuschow I hated the first two films, I thought they were simply horror done wrong with no originality at all. Cookie cutter horror and done badly, really really badly.The third was expected to be just as bad but was a pleasant surprise, it's still mediocre but its passable by comparison.This time the film actually has a structure, a competent plot and the "Boogeyman" isn't bad at all in appearance/execution.It follows a tried and tested formula, kids in uni getting picked off one by one by this malevolent force but the "Belief" system makes for some interesting scenarios.The deaths are average, the script is passable and the movie as a whole is nothing even remotely special but compared to the first two this is a work of art.Just about watchable stuff and certainly ending the trilogy on a high....ish note.The Good:Boogeyman looks greatHas a few very inventive ideasA couple of the girls on the cast were greatThe Bad:Potential was squanderedStill very genericThings I Learnt From This Movie:That girl from Coronation Street & Hollyoaks doesn't know how to age! Seriously, she has access to the fountain of eternal youth and I demand a pint or two....or three...or a weekend of bathing in it! I'm approaching 40 leave me alone!

ctomvelu1 After shifting from a supernatural entity in "Boogeyman" to a flesh and blood lunatic in "Boogeyman 2," the killer in Part Three is once again of supernatural origin. A demonic creature, looking like something from a well-known demented rock band, is knocking off college student, and one girl does her best to stop the slaughter. Unfortunately, she doesn't fare very well. And no one believes her. The opening sequence, involving an old trunk, is a dilly. The rest of the movie unfortunately plods, although the murders do pile up quite rapidly. There's also some brief nudity for the guys to relish. Unfortunately, this boogyeyman is no more scary than the boogeyman in the original. Well three movies makes a series, right? Let's just hope this is the last we will see of this boogeyman.

Paul Magne Haakonsen I watched "Boogeyman 3" without having seen the previous 2, although they are in my collection. So I had no expectations to the movie, and I had little clue what it was all about. And it seemed that you didn't really need to have watched the first two movies to be in the loop."Boogeyman 3" is not rich on shocks, creepy moments or scares, though I have a decent enough amount of gore in it. I found this to be a rather dull movie for a horror movie. I wasn't thoroughly entertained and I sure wasn't feeling any sense of dread.The story told in this movie, well it was a bit weak and there were some gaps in the overall flow of the story. But it did manage to pull through and close up nicely enough.Not being familiar with the boogeyman from the previous two movies, I found the make up to actually be quite nice. He looked sinister enough, especially the face. However, and I must point this out, the noises he made, what was up with that? They were more of a hilarious thing than a scary thing. That really didn't work well for the movie. And why would he be chasing people when he can apparently just appear from any shadow or dark place? What was the point of chasing the tail of people? For shocking and scaring the people, sure. But if you think about it, it really made no sense.The effects and CGIs in "Boogeyman 3" were good enough, and I liked what I saw. The blood, however, was a tad too red. But other than that, good enough job.As for the acting and the people starring in this movie. I found most people to actually do a good enough job with their roles. Nothing award-winning here, but still good for a horror movie of this caliber.If the "Boogeyman" series is an attempt at a slasher like Jason Voorhees or Freddy Krueger, then it is not much of a memorable character they have as the killer. There is nothing iconic about this boogeyman, sorry to say.For a horror movie, "Boogeyman 3" came off quite weak, and there are lots of other horror movies out there far better. Now that I have seen it, I can honestly say that I will not pick it up and watch it again. I will, however, watch part 1 and 2, just for the sake of having seen them.

Najam Fazal I really doesn't find any sense in this movie the BoogeyMan is a belief or what ? i don't know why they make it again and again, a 90 minute waste, this movie has nothing which belongs to Horror neither the script defines the clarity of the concept of BoogeyMan plus no connection with the past sequel is projected . Some of the sound effects are not synchronized with the time line of the movie i don't know what people like in this movie. However the actors really tried their best but they land up in a failure, the direction must in a way which keeps you glued to your seats with some sluggish camera work and screenplay the story seems to be stuck at many places.A total disaster, silly piece of horror or you can simply say "A 90 Minute Trash"