Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

InformationRap This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

brthrn "You take mine and I'll take yours..."Just finished viewing Charly Cantor's film BLOOD (Not to be confused with the rather disappointing anime release of the same title). From the movie box. I suspected that this was going to be rather girly/artsy vampire flick. My assumption was WAY off. BLOOD _is_ artsy. But not pretentious. It's a vampire film made by people that actually had the patience to sit down and plot out an interesting story. And. Since it's not an American genre film (It's English, I think) BLOOD actually has a cast of TALENTED ACTORS! Perish the thought.BLOOD tells the story of Nix, a genetically engineered vampire whose blood, when imbibed, produces highly euphoric effects for the user and has a HIGHLY addictive nature. Yes. That's right. Another medical-science-gone-horribly-wrong-through-genetic-experimentation- vampirism-as-an-addiction-metaphor movie! And although Nix is the product of science. She is still a magical creature. She's a vampire. And people are eerily drawn to her. And then she destroys them.I don't want to give away too much. It's a great story. Well-paced. And very erotic (Oh. Yes. Sex & Blood. Blood & Sex. For those of _you_ who are into that sort of thing...). The chick who plays Nix is...um...stunning. Enchanting. Even. Very well cast film.Guilt and greed. Addiction. A father's betrayal. And more than just a subtle treatise on the true Nature of relationships and Love...and need...If you're a fan of films like MARTIN, or CHRONOS or NADJA. Then you will not be disappointed by BLOOD.Well done. Hats off to the film-makers.

stellar-1 This film was originally completed in 1998 but the end result was so long and so boring that I still found myself yawning whilst watching it on fast forward. It obviously didn't sell so the producers re-cut it and re-released it in 2000. However, I doubt this act of desperation can undo the tedious self indulgence of this amateur work.

hargulaf Good idea, good filming, fair/good acting BUT who forgot to cut the film, and was it really necessary to explain the plot down to the last comma for the audience? Both these problems will be fairly solved if approximately one hour is removed, preferably by razors

Gyro Gearloose I saw this movie at the Fantasia festival here in Montreal. The first five minutes had some promise but then it quickly fell apart into a dreadfully slow and boring "story", which didn't make much sense anyway. I walked out before the end, because no human being can endure over two hours of this. It's too long, nothing happens, it could easily stand to lose an hour (not kidding), without affecting the "plot".Just to give you an idea, the scenes which were supposed to be scary or disgusting, people in the audience just laughed (half heartedly).Not scary at all, no suspense (because I just didn't care about any of the characters), and just too long.STAY AWAY AT ALL COSTS.