jerry-saleem
Sai is a young talented artist living living in aloft that anyone here in New York city would pay a small fortune to rent ,it is amazing that in films like this money may be discussed but never seems to be too much of a problem.this seems to be point of attraction for a handsome European man ,Renfield(Jonathan Oldham) he slowly infuse himself into Sais tight circle of friends these r kindred spirits including a photographer ,Royce (Chris Ivan Cevic) ,aspiring novelist Eric(Alex Petrovitch)and the request musician Kerra(Micheal Morrow) as is typical in a movie of this sort they r all extremely attractive and had a predilection to a experimental substances. this sets them as the perfect victims when Renfield offers them a new drug seduced into trying strange new drug by an by an enigmatic foreigner Sai enters into dreamlike realm where reality fantasy collide.awaiting her arrival in that world is a dimensional vampire who needs her new found thirst for blood to cross into the physical plane .the stronger her addiction grows .the closer being comes to realizing his true power different takes on the vampire genre a really great movie which makes people expectations higher.i was no disappointed by this flick ,whats wrong with u people so u r a criticizing a film because it does not fit a genre????this film is great because it does not feature some old man in a cap, r a beautiful young sexy vampire that every girls find sexy come on this film is great because its a complete new approach in fact its makes a lot of sense we r not talking about full fledge vampire,we r talking about a succubus which is slightly different from the average vampire BUT MAKE NOT MISTAKE THIS IS A HIGH STANDARD release a best film trust me watch it if u had a best taste of films
kristenall
Honestly the worst movie I have ever seen. As soon as it begins you just know that it's going to be painfully boring.It was unbelievably repetitive and it seemed to go no where at all, and it just as if you were watching the same thing over and over. The whole movie you feel as if it's building up for something to happen, and when something finally does happen, it is it always very expected and not in anyway something worth building up to at all. The story line so sketchy and rough. I did understand the story behind the movie, but I didn't feel like it was portrayed very well. At the end of the movie, it was kind of like, 'oh here's what the whole movie meant by the way, even though it's really not that exciting.' I suggest you don't bother with it.
DSP919
While this movie does not have high production values by today's standards, it is about a subject that few filmmakers broach so openly--the hallucinatory effects of drugs. Many famous historical personalities had experiences with drugs, notably poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the painter Modigliani, whom Picasso admired greatly. I enjoyed this "B" movie as a thrill ride, because, like Coleridge's poem Kubla Khan, it was the product of a drug-induced state. The protagonist is an artist whose whose work appears to be enhanced by the drug experience, despite its other more frightening aspects which include turning her into a vampire. Like many other horror movies released in the past year, "Bled" fills a gap now that was filled by Stephen King, and a few others, 20 years ago, and previous to that, by The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits. "B" horror movies come in many different forms but they are a distinct genre, just as gangster/crime films form a (usually) distinct genre, and war movies, and comedies. I use the B label to distinguish it from A movies, which have higher production values and are more profound: in my opinion, A movies from last year include Star Trek,The Hurt Locker,The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 (remake), and Brothers.While last year may not have been the greatest year for "B" horror movies, I did watch quite a few, and I liked them all at least some, for various reasons. Some fall more in the sci fi category, and some are better considered in both categories. Many were poorly reviewed, and some were only reviewed by horror film aficionados. Some were clearly made only to make money, and are not that good, particularly those that have already been explored previously. The best film I have seen in the past year, in this category, is "Shutter Island." It may end up with some Oscar nominations, and if it doesn't, it should. Second, perhaps, is "Drag Me To Hell" in which Sam Raimi piles on the supernatural special effects in a story of a gypsy's curse. The others include, "The Wolfman", "The Crazies", "The Graves", "Pandorum", "The Thaw","Pandemic", "Hardwired", "The Butterfly Effect: Revelations", End Game (2009),"The Devil's Tomb", "Deadline" and "The Train" (both with Thora Birch),"Mirrors","The Uninvited" "My Bloody Valentine", "Hard Candy" (actually from 2-3 years ago and with a younger Ellen Page), "Farmhouse", "The Last House on the Left" (remake), "The Strangers" (stands out to me, despite a mediocre review from Rogert Ebert), "The Horsemen", "The Box", "Final Destination 3-D" "Dark Country", "Hydra", "The Killing Room", "The Fourth Kind", "Children Of The Corn" (remake) and "District 9". This is a selective list.
