Vashirdfel Simply A Masterpiece

Rijndri Load of rubbish!!

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Donald Seymour This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

midge56 I strongly disagree with the other reviewer's fixer suggestions. Those were clearly the suggestions only a 20 year old would like with no consideration of what OTHER viewers might like.The first problem was nobody over 21 wants to see a movie which is nothing but a bunch of kids as the sole focus of the movie. Especially wearing cookpots on their heads & stupid pieces of debris & crushed cans, etc. What is this... an "Our Gang" episode? No. You don't need to fill the show with fake blood as suggested unless you want to lose what little audience you had... not to mention damage your rating further. That again is something a juvenile would want. Adults do not need graphic violence to enjoy a movie. Nor should a writer present his work for the opinions & criticisms of the cast & crew. He may be a bad writer but that would end his career permanently if he asked for suggestions. The only opinions a writer can afford to request is from a trusted friend or spouse. However, a good director should have held a script review with the cast & writer where issues would be discussed in general.However, he was right about no parent allowing their child or teen to watch this movie. Since no adult wants to watch a bunch of self denigrating kids with 1930's style cookpots, makeshift swords, etc. All we were missing was the beanie with the propeller. That leaves you with the low end of the 17-21 age groups for an audience. Parents wont allow anyone younger to attend. Adults don't want to watch a movie about confused kids. Remember what happened to "Last action hero"? The audience came to see Schwarzenegger as the star. Not a kid. The movie failed miserably. It takes a rare quality family show with a great story like Harry Potter, Enders Game or Daryl for a film starring kids to be a success.The majority of the movie should have been on the Skyark with plenty of clean technology & more about the conditions, the rebels, the interactions between the Skyark groups & their families. Not violence & endless battles. Also, a better ending on the Skyark.We don't need more dirt or scroungier kids either. Nor do we need to see a B movie Zombie show. Again, that is something a juvenile would come up with. Those fixer suggestions would have done worse, not better.You needed to find a better premise & plot instead of dumping a group of confused kids into a Zombie version of Our Gang. I do agree that these kids had no idea what they were doing & the dialogue & actions were clearly missing direction & guidance. No one wants to see constant self denial & lack of energy from any actor. Much less children. I cannot understand how anyone could throw away good money to produce a film without ensuring they have a good story and competent actors which would compel an audience to watch it.He was right that you should consider the age group you are targeting. Despite starring kids, this was not fit for kids or families & is not a theme for adults either. Just that slim 17-21 age group.As it is, this movie is a waste of time. Too violent for kids & unpalatable for adults.

Penny Bird I sat through most of the movie with a look of utter disbelief of how bad this movie was! It felt like a bad film school production with amateur actors from the local drama club. To be honest, I've seen better from amateurs.The description is totally inaccurate too! The story line does not match enough of the description of the movie. Clearly this was so low budget they didn't have enough time to expand on the reasons for skyark in the first place and tried to set the premise with the description on the cover. They failed. Don't waste your time seeing this ! It was too bad to even laugh at it. This is my first ever review on IMDb .. i registered just to leave this review.. that's how much I want to tell people not to watch it!! ... unless you are a film school student and want to learn what NOT to do !

shradhey The movie is supposed to be futuristic but the way it's made it looks dated and old. The actors are young and inexperienced (I hope so) The story is boring and predictable but is presented in most chaotic manner. The CGI effects are basic and poor quality. If you want to make a low budget movie - I don't think science fiction is a good option.Now my opinion on the movie - It's kind of movie where you wish there was a negative ranking on IMDb. Where you can give a movie -2 or -3 because there is hardly anything good in the movie and it's full of mistakes, awful acting and cheap CGI. It can become the 'Room' one day and people might start watching it as it's so bad. The minimum length of review on IMDb is 10 lines otherwise just the word 'awful' will do sufficient job in describing this movie. As previous reviews mention - if you are having difficulties sleeping - this is a good movie to put on. You can get around your friends and family and have a laugh watching this as well. Enough said.

aaaaaa-979-170680 Firstly, create a new category: "Sci-FRid" (Science - "F"ing Ridiculous). Secondly, "Rags"? . . . (Scriptwriters please review your meds {sic}or better still go heavier on the illegal substances. Think - is this movie set in the future or the 1980's?) Thirdly, what are the chances for "sky-arkies" becoming the new "trekkies"? OK, finally my keyword recommendations are: "Sci-FRid" (already explained) "Out-of-this- World" (nothing to do with the plot, just where we should send the scriptwriters); and, "Black-Listed" (the only way this movie will attract a default audience).2 outa {sic} 10 "I know I should not watch this, but rebellion is my compulsion fixes".