CheerupSilver
Very Cool!!!
Nessieldwi
Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.
Anoushka Slater
While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.
Slopo Rodrigez
I'm no critic... just an average movie viewer.However, after seeing this movie, I had to write this commentary to tell you my thoughts. I'll keep it simple.Acting was below average. Directing/editing is disappointing.I could see where they were going with the story and it had so much potential but it fell short in so many places. In some instances it was confusing and erratic.And the ending... well... that didn't really make a lot of sense but I could see the intention.Audio production is at times woeful and inconsistent throughout the entire movie. Levels and EQ (equalisation) were all over the place.There were a few good moments in the movie that made me think there was some hope for it to get better... but they quickly disappeared. Overall, poorly executed by both production and acting - could have been so much better... shame.I'm sure there are better reviews about this movie but I had to pass on my thoughts...You can find much better ways to spend 95 minutes - sitting through this movie is NOT one of them.
Paul Magne Haakonsen
It happens only rarely, very rarely I might add, that a movie turns out to be so utterly boring and uninteresting that I have to give up on it and turn it off. "A Dangerous Place", however, turned out to be one such movie.The story, as far as I made it into the movie, is about a woman who apparently lost her husband in the World Trade Center tragedy, but he has come back as a ghost. The woman is not the mother to her child that she should be, and is more devoted to her work than her family. And a deadly outbreak of Tubercolosis runs rampant.To me there was absolutely no coherent red thread in the storyline, and it seemed like it was a heap of mere random clips put together to attempt forming a movie. It just didn't really make much sense most of the time.As for the acting in the movie, well I wouldn't exactly say that the performances were poor or bad, but they just weren't overly impressive either. None of the performances managed to leave a lasting impression on me. But I can't hardly say that any of the performances that I witnessed were helping the movie along in any great way either.I think I made it about halfway into the movie, because I had to give up and find some other movie to watch out of sheer boredom and lack of interest in the storyline portrayed in "A Dangerous Place". And I can honestly say that I have no intention of attempting to finishing it either, it was just that devoid of appeal.
jakeb8080
I've seen ADP 3 times already and I pick up on new things every time I watch it. The plot is multi-faceted and keeps you engaged the entire movie. I was so engrossed that by the end of the movie, I wanted more! It's not everyday you watch a thriller that seems like it could actually happen in real life, but ADP was able to overcome that barrier and make the plot seem real.Also, it was interesting to see a woman play the lead in a thriller, but Kristen Dalton nailed it! Great watch that will keep you wanting more...I think anyone would enjoy it.
lysergic-acid
So a movie with a 2.8 rating has 22 reviews, all giving it 8, 9, or 10 out of 10 stars and filled from beginning to end with soapy blind praise for the film and over-the-top fawning for the film makers. Oh and surprisingly all of these rather generic and utterly useless reviews have 100% usefulness ratings.But the really odd part about all this is the fact that all 22 users have only a single review to each of their accounts and no message board posts. So they happen to have no interest or strong feelings about any movies except this one--amazing! Well, this is either the best indie film ever made or a film so bad, by filmmakers so incompetent and with so little professional integrity, that they actually resorted to such a tactless and blatant astroturf job.And it should be no surprise to anyone that it's not the former. This movie is really, _really_ bad (even worse than the trailer). Paying barely literate people to spam positive reviews for their film on IMDb and YouTube is pretty much the only way they can trick anyone into watching this rubbish. But they couldn't even do that right.What they really should have done was use all that money to hire some professional writers and film makers to make an actually decent film for them.P.S. See the message board discussion entitled "Reviews" for more anomalies.
