Zen-2-Zen
I'll try not to spoil the plot for anyone, especially since while you will guess the direction in which the fate of the heroine is moving you won't guess the final resolution till the last moment.What makes this masterpiece so rare is the confluence of four exceptional artists which allowed unprecedented blending of music into a thriller with well developed characters. Not as a background but as a part of the story. Let's just say that if you skip the lyrics you won't be able to follow the motivation of main characters. This is what allowed it to stand the test of time. I watched it 27 years after it was made and it is as fresh and vibrant as if it was this year's production.First of the four is of course Ostrovsky who wrote a thriller with character development and emotional story that will keep you guessing to the very end even after you know each character, it's motivation, and sometimes even fate. It's close to knowing that is Titanic going to sink but you can't stop watching since it's the "how" and fine grained aspects that really matter.Even without the other cinematic elements the play itself would make for a good movie, but for director (Eldar Ryazanov) this is just the beginning. Ryazanov is the principal artist here who takes the credit not just for the exceptional blending of music but also for making the actual big river (Volga) and an old steamboat integral parts of the story and metaphors. One can easily imagine Missisippy and Jazz instead of Gypsy music, or Danube and a Strauss waltz band without any change to the story. He made conceptual structure completely universal while keeping the full flavor of the old Russia.The composer (Andrei Petrov) is the next artist equally responsible for this rare blend and not just the instrumental part but also vocal, actual poetry used for lyrics and the stylization and blending of Russian Gypsy music.Last but not least - Nikita Mikhalkov as the male lead and the heart and soul of the ensemble who managed to combine tragic, comic and even musical aspects in impeccable performance with surprising facial and physical acting capabilities.This is the ensemble play/film, meaning that most actors had to work hard to make their characters alive, but female lead (Larisa Guzeyeva ) deserves special praise for effective blending of dramatic and musical aspects doubling up as narrative. Also, there are virtually no precision cutting tricks (director cutting into replicas to make it look like less capable actors actually played emotions and transitions). Scenes are mostly filmed in long shots with minimal editing. Just that aspect provides the quality an order of magnitude above a comparable Hollywood production. It's not that it's not doable but that the cost of production would be prohibitively high to reach that level.And in the end I will say (А напоследок я скажу :-) this is one of the films to keep and watch again every several years. Like the big river, it constantly flows, and is constantly fresh.
Cristi_Ciopron
Eldar Ryazanov's greatest achievement was to make a Faubourg melodrama be suave and fresh,and to give it elegance and gusto,and a fitting fluidity;it has atmosphere,unity,gusto,the plastic is extraordinary:an enormously,lavishly delighting movie.While I was enjoying A Cruel Romance (1984),this movie picturesque and colorful and completely charming,I remembered how I saw it for the first time,in a theater,many years ago,as a kid and already a movie buff,with my late grandmother and with my godmother;at that age,I was impressed with the climactic final.An older gossip (Alisa Frejndlikh) at a pinch is pressed to marry away her third daughter,Larisa,the most profitable and advantageous way possible.Wonderfully written,and even more exquisitely constructed,Zhestokiy Romans (1984) boasts in featuring a still young beau Mihalkov as a slender and quite sluggard dandy of the slums;he was supple,nonchalant,mean and suburban.The role is mainly a physical one,and behind the mendacious slum dandy one feels the cold-hearted,evil-minded streetwise hooligan.Mihalkov is unmatched in giving "Serghei Sergheevitch",his character,a powerful interest.He is teamed with a wondrous,beaming beauty,the truly sensational Larisa Guzeyeva (here in her debut;very unfortunately,she did not make much of a career after Zhestokiy Romans ,1984,though she deserved to have one). The other characters are very well sketched, frightful figures of grotesque,the provincial fauna;a tedious and verminous clerk,two cynical and bitchy merchants,Knurov and Vojevatov.The atmosphere is chilling,a small provincial world devoured by sordidness:the ancient humanity,left to itself.A Cruel Romance (1984) succeeds in being much more than a lowbrow Faubourg tale:namely,in inspiring compassion for a human being,Larisa,and she is not a bit idealized;it is a Russian story about fate.The script may be lowbrow and conventional,but it is not in the least stupid.Ryazanov's astounding showmanship is undeniable,and the cast could not be better: Mrs. Alisa Frejndlikh,Aleksei Petrenko and Viktor Proskurin,Andrei Miagkov and Georgi Burkov are extremely good in their roles.With such a poor,unpromising and precarious content,the movie could very easily turn into something as provincial and insipid as a Frank Capra or a Nora Ephron film;but once again,the genre is nothing,the genre is a mere premise,the film itself is everything,and Eldar Ryazanov gave his film simplicity as well as transparency,gusto and charm,a delicious coloring;it is,for me,the very definition of charm and beauty;once again,the Russians are the masters of the coloration.Zhestokiy Romans (1984)staggers,surprises and delights by the keen sense of comprehensive width,by recreating a space traversed by the currents of freshness,life,spontaneity.The affective gamut is one of coldness,alienation and derision,mockery:the greed,the baseness,the intrigue,the lust,the brazenness have human shapes,the abominable cheek of promiscuity:Aleksandr Ostrovsky was a bitter moralist.The plastic gamut,on the other hand,unfolds relishing and cooling colors,inexhaustible treasures of visual delight,glacial colors that caress the heart.It is long since the art knew how to convincingly couch the range of threat,the embittered,ominous machinations gathering slowly under the eaves of a helpless and giddy being;Zhestokiy Romans (1984)does it;Larisa is not idealized,she is not adorned with improbable qualities.She is described simply as a being without malice. But the script is remarkably sober and balanced;the lines are well conceived.The scale confesses a Zolist impact,the influence of the Russian lesser realists and naturalists.
