Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

Mjeteconer Just perfect...

Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

jonjon0406 There is no plot to this movie. I'm embarrassed to say I sat through this entire movie. There is no exposition, no motive, nothing. The landlord character is your run-of-the-mill mentally depraved psychopath. Oh but let's not stop there - make him filthy, handicap-addled, and mouth perpetually agape. His actions are never explained, and there is no rhyme or reason to anything. It is disingenuous filmmaking at its worst.

funnyman-43105 There's a good chance i'm a sucker for "good" endings which could discredit my whole refute of this movie. However, the ending was complete garbage. Just characters being dumb. Classic dumb dumb dumb. Read my spoiler complaints and you'll see why the movie sucks. I may be watching the wrong kind of movie to get a somewhat "good" ending. Just one solid hit on old man is all I ask for. They all die and the prego chick gets taken? Come on. What a dark dark end to my day. Just blows.Spoiler- First, why in the heck would the main guy with the bat leave princess cheater and queen prego alone in the bathroom and go on a darkened safari for some creepily buff looking old man? Nonsense. Wait in the room and have him come to you. Keep the control idiot. Second, princess cheater is the slowest moving piece of garbage. She gets out the window to go call for help and takes about two steps out the window before "hiding" then the bumbling old man somehow sneaks up on her enough to be unexpectedly tackled into the pool. Take more than two steps you idiot. All the while the freaking neighbors are dumber than nails. Who doesn't hear those screams? I mean come on. Someone had to have heard something.

tbymcm1 I initially read the plot concept and was intrigued. This style of antagonist/main character has been done before but I was excited to see a fresh, creepy new perspective. There are several issues with the movie: poor script writing, elusive character development, and confusing scenes which don't contribute to the overall plot. You can definitely tell this is an indie movie just by seeing the production quality. Then comes the acting. I'm torn about this because (for me) PJ McCabe was a terrible actor. The role may fit him, but character development was shallow and elusive. The REAL star (and the reason I rate it 6 stars) is Neville Archambault. His body language, connection with the character, and passion shine through this movie. There are two specific scenes where I'm left saying "what is Gerald's motive? What are the reasons for his actions?" Then I realize that (intentional or not) this amplifies the character Neville has chosen. Not the best indie movie I have seen, but worth a watch.

Michael Ledo Ryan (PJ McCabe) has it all: An expecting wife (Brianne Moncrief) a new residence, a beautiful mistress (Sarah Baldwin) and a voyeur landlord (Neville Archambault) into fiber optics and smells likes septic. Neville Archambault managed to come across as a creepy voyeur in a league of his own. He watches over his tenants as we await the "twists" which are not really remarkable.For me the voyeur feel seems to be missing without a hole in the wall. With that perv aspect lacking, the horror/thriller aspect didn't pick up the slack. I didn't know why he didn't install all the cameras correctly in the first place or how he installed one in the pool liner. That locked door thing didn't make any sense either. Good use of duct tape.Guide: F-word, sex, nudity (Sarah Baldwin)