Mjeteconer Just perfect...

Matialth Good concept, poorly executed.

Voxitype Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

raderpat I used to love Anderson Cooper and his 360 show. But the election coverage has brought out the worst in him. He's getting as bad as Nancy Grace, arguing with guests, talking over people he disagrees with, etc. He is transparently a Hillary fan which is his prerogative. But, he should be reporting the news, not trying to make the news by trying to shove his opinions down people's throats.I certainly hope he returns to the Anderson that I've always loved after this miserable election is over.I just read that his daytime show is being canceled. I hope they do not cancel the "360" show. He's usually a very talented host. I think he has let this election change him into an opinionated ogre!!

mm-39 360 with Anderson Cooper is not a bad show. The show leans towards the left. They have Lou Doubs, and Glean Beck for equal time. At least, Cooper is not so biased so Cooper shows both sides of a issue. Cooper does not roll around on the ground and act silly like some liberals over some issues. Hillary is a candidate not someone a news journalist acts objectively towards. What's happening and why is how Copper follows Hillary's campaign. Cooper does not have the best voice or most entertaining analog, but Coopers continuity provide a strong balance for the show. 6 out of 10. I watch 360 sometimes, and I do not watch news shows anymore. News is too by the numbers with opinions instead of issues which I find uninteresting. I wonder who's news opinion is right. Why is Ted Kennedy's endorsement mean so much for someones campaign. Why is it news worthy? What about the issues? What really happened? In the the truth is objective? Plato once said what is truth?

archyteckie08 Anderson Cooper 360 is a decent show but not a great one. When its at its best, its does an insightful and entertaining take on the news. Kind of like a "Behind the scenes" look at the news; showing why, how, and where it happened they way it did. At its worst, it painfully showcases Anderson Cooper seemingly amateur anchor skills. Don't get me wrong, Cooper is an excellent field reporter and a more than capable journalist. But put him in a studio and drape him in a nice suit, he loses his "it" factor.He's young and ambitious. So, I have little doubt that he will find his anchoring voice evidently. He's far more than just a pretty face. If anything, I see Anderson Cooper 360 as less of a show but more of a training ground for Cooper to fine tune himself to an excellent anchorman.Its far more entertaining to watch if you view it in this matter.It makes his occasional goofs, mistakes, and misses more endearing than annoying and when he gets it right, you could easily picture him as a future network news star. For that reason alone, he's show is worth watching occasionally but certainly not a must see every single day. Unless, you think Anderson is just that good-looking.

buddhadan-1 I'm not as much of a fan of CNN now that they have opted to go with a bunch of new people giving the news and even commentary as opposed to just news.I'm not sure that I blame Anderson Cooper in person for this negative effect on the CNN franchise, but he is one of those that I would rather not see unless he's just giving news.I think it's because I always saw CNN as a means to just news without commentary, without lots of color or modification. News in the raw as it happens.Lately they have brought on a group of people that do commentary, discussion, and fluff and regretfully this show by Anderson Cooper is one of them.Bring back the news as it is, raw and unscripted.