BootDigest Such a frustrating disappointment

Vashirdfel Simply A Masterpiece

Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Horst in Translation (filmreviews@web.de) "Yes, We Have No Bonanza" is one of the final quotes of Curly in this 1939 short film starring the Three Stooges and the film itself was named after said quote. It is over 75 years old already and came out the very year World War II started. The film runs for 16 minutes and is in black-and-white which is approximately true for the majority of Stooges short movies. Here they are in the Wild West and the title of my review refers to the very first scene, in which we see the Stooges with thick mustaches. Other than that, the story is pretty generic and similar to other Sttoges short films. The trio is working honestly to get money, but they run into a bunch of crooks and their hidden treasure. But luck is not on our heroes' side for long. The only thing missing here really are the love interests for the Stooges. This film is actually a remake of a completely unknown Jules White movie from five years earlier. And the jokes and slapstick humor in here are nothing new either. It's exactly what you see in every other Stooges film. I myself am not a huge fan of the trio, but that's just subjective. If you like other works from them, you will probably like this one too as it is one of their more known works (also because of Curly still being in here) and has a pretty decent rating here on IMDb, which is way too high for my taste. Oh yeah and people loves animals on screen back then, so a little dog can be seen occasionally too. I give it a thumbs-down though. Not recommended.

bkoganbing It's not the old west that the Three Stooges are doing their thing in Yes We Have No Bonanza. Instead Moe, Larry, and Curly are in the more modern west of Roy Rogers B films with people using automobiles as much as horses. The boys are working as waiters, singing waiters even in a saloon where they hope to make a stake and go prospecting. Lending authenticity to this western spoof is traditional movie western villain Dick Curtis who owns the saloon the Stooges work in.Both in the town scenes and later out on the desert I have to say that Dick Curtis looked like he was as enjoying this as much as the Stooges. In a sense Curtis was like Douglass Dumbrille who was a serious villain in many films, but then did comic villains and did them well with people like Abbott&Costello and the Marx Brothers.I guess the title sort of gives it away that the boys don't get fame and fortune, just a lot of laughs.

ccthemovieman-1 This is a somewhat familiar storyline of the good-hearted Three Stooges trying to help out their girls by earning some money to get them out of debt. In this case, their nasty boss is threatening their girls father. The boss also is the boys' boss as all six of them work in this saloon out West. It's not the "Old West" days, though, because there are automobiles but everything else looks like the 1800s. The boys also hope to marry the girls, if they are financially better off, so that's added incentive.As also is the case many times, the nasty boss is a crook. In this story, the guy and a cohort had robbed a bank and stashed the money in a hole in the ground outside of town. You-know-who just happens to discover the money the next day!Among the insane sights in this Stooges short is a burro wearing galoshes. The burro is named "Yorick," and when it appears it was accidentally blown up, yes, we hear: "Alas, poor Yorick. We knew him well." (You knew that line was coming!)Overall, a silly and so-so episode but entertaining in its goofy way.

davidbielski I know I've seen this one a million times,BUT Is this the one where Curley says"Ain't Nature Wonderful"?I have a tapeworm's lunch bet on it! According to your guidelines, a comment have to be 10 lines or more. I don't think anyone of the Stooges shorts had more than ten lines of dialog, and you want 10 lines of comments? That's stretching things a little, don't you think, unless of course, the one's submitting comments are a bit on the long winded sort. I'm having difficulty stretching this request longer then I have proceeded so far. I still need two lines in order for this request to go through. I've already over burnt the toast for the tapeworm lunch, on the pure premise that I will be losing this bet in the first place, because this isn't the type of site I was looking for. A place where Stooge devotees could get an answer to questions that goggle doesn't even possess. Is that 10 yet?Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. It rottenly is! And I know that was spelled wrong, Spelt, if you're from the U.K.