The Producers

2005 "They had everything to gain by not being a success!"
6.3| 2h14m| PG-13| en
Details

After putting together another Broadway flop, down-on-his-luck producer Max Bialystock teams up with timid accountant Leo Bloom in a get-rich-quick scheme to put on the world's worst show.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

ChanFamous I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.
Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.
Brendon Jones It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
Taha Avalos The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.
Jackson Booth-Millard The original Mel Brooks movie is a classic, about two impresarios deliberately making a flop stage show that becomes a success, then the movie was turned into a real successful Broadway show, then this stage show is turned into a remake movie, and ironically, it flops, but I still gave it a chance. Basically Max Bialystock (Golden Globe nominated Nathan Lane) was once a top Broadway producer ("Opening Night"), but is now washed up, and resorting to wooing and seducing wealthy elderly women to raise money for his shows, many becoming flops. Nervous and hysterical Leo Bloom (Matthew Broderick) is an accountant sent from Max's firm to study his books, and in doing so he finds that his last show raised more money than was required. Leo makes a passing comment that selling shares and embezzling in a show that is guaranteed to be a flop could generate a fortune, more than that of a hit show that runs and runs, Max tries to convince him to run with this scheme ("We Can Do It"). Returning to his accountancy firm, Leo fantasises about being a Broadway producer ("I Wanna Be a Producer"), he decides to quit his job and forms "Bialystock & Bloom" with Max. Max and Leo search for the worst play ever written, and they find Springtime for Hitler, a musical celebrating the Führer, written by an ex-Nazi named Franz Liebkind (Golden Globe nominated Will Ferrell), they meet with Franz to acquire the rights to the musical, performing Hitler's favourite song and taking "Siegfried Oath" ("Der Guten Tag Hop-Clop"). To ensure the play's failure, they also seek the worst director possible, they meet flamboyant director Roger De Bris (Gary Beach) and his assistant Carmen Ghia (Roger Bart), Roger is reluctant to direct, but Max and Leo suggest he could win a Tony, he agrees, on the condition the play be more "gay" ("Keep It Gay"). Back at their office, attractive Swedish woman Ulla Inga Hansen Benson Yansen Tallen Hallen Svaden Swanson (Uma Thurman), or simply Ulla, appears to audition, Leo says that they have not started casting, Max hires her as a secretary until she can audition ("When You've Got It, Flaunt It"). To get the money they need to produce the show, Max has dalliances with several elderly women ("Along Came Bialy"), allowing him to raise the $2 million, while Leo shares a kiss with Ulla ("That Face"). Franz is angered at the auditions for role of Adolf Hitler by a performer's rendition of a German song, he storms the stage and performs it himself ("Haben Sie gehört das Deutsche Band?"), based on his performance, Max hires Franz to play Hitler. On opening night, the cast and crew are preparing, Leo wishes everyone "good luck", but everyone warns him that this is bad luck, he should say "break a leg" ("You Never Say Good Luck on Opening Night"). Franz leaves to prepare and breaks his leg, Max needs someone to take over the role of Hitler, he asks Roger to perform, as he knows the lines, Roger accepts. As the show opens, the audience is horrified at the first song ("Springtime for Hitler"), with some walking out in disgust. This is until Roger enters as Hitler, his flamboyant interpretation creates laughter, the audience misinterpret the play as satire, resulting in the show becoming a smash. Max and Leo realise they have failed to create a flop, and they argue that the IRS will learn of their crimes, then Franz appears with a gun to shoot them for breaking the Siegfried Oath by mocking Hitler, the gunshots alert the police, Franz breaks his other leg as the duo try to evade the police. Max is arrested and imprisoned for tax fraud, while Leo gets away to Rio de Janeiro to marry Ulla ("Betrayed"), but at sentencing, Max is saved by Leo, who returns to defend him ("'Til Him"). The judge (David Huddleston) realises Max and Leo are inseparable, they are both sentenced to five years at Sing Sing Prison with Franz, there they write and produce a new musical ("Prisoners of Love"). Leo, Max, and Franz are pardoned by the governor for their work, allowing them to collaborate with Roger and Ulla and release Prisoners of Love, this hit play means Max and Leo go on to become successful Broadway producers. Also starring Jon Lovitz as Mr. Marks, This Is Spinal Tap's Michael McKean as Prison Trustee, Richard Kind as Jury Foreman, John Barrowman as Lead Tenor and Mel Brooks as himself, and the voices of Tom the Cat and Hilda the Pigeon. Lane and Broderick are nowhere as good as Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel, but they are just about passable as the leading duo, Thurman is beautiful and amusing, and Ferrell is amusingly ridiculous. The original premise story, premise and format remain pretty much the same, it is different with the more colourful production, and the obvious addition of songs, those from the show are fine, there are some additional ones that don't work as well, and it has been made a longer film which is a bit annoying, overall it is an alright musical comedy. It was nominated the Golden Globes for Best Motion Picture - Comedy or Musical and Best Original Song for "There's Nothing Like a Show on Broadway". Okay!
Fiona Brone Who knew? Time only improves this magnificent tribute to professional quality. In a time where entertainment is all about "Amateur" - eg amateur singers, amateur bakers, amateur shows about amateurs, the joy of The Producers rises and rises.If XFactor off-key warbling and tragic back stories have you throwing your IPad on the floor, this slice of theatre perfection will have you rolling on the floor and rushing back to the black monster TV on the wall. With joy, pleasure and sore face smiling! Nathan Lane and Broderick Crawford bring the triple threat of dance, song and acting with bursting-out of a canon power. The cast all do everything to perfection. Script - it's four yeses from me, set and costume it's a four out of four and high-fives for the camera work! PC is totally incorrect and has increased over the years - rudeness about transgender frocks, 'keep it gay, gay,' and words cannot describe the shocking ageist portrayal with sex and zimmer frames! Then there's Hitler.But most of all there's talent. Everyone's got Talent.
SnoopyStyle Max Bialystock (Nathan Lane) is a bad producer who scams old ladies out of their savings. Meek accountant Leo Bloom (Matthew Broderick) is sent to work on his books. Leo imagines a scheme to steal a much bigger take with a horrendous flop. Max jumps on it right away and Leo comes to realize that "I wanna be a Producer". They find the completely inappropriate "Springtime for Hitler" written by Nazi sympathizer Franz Liebkind (Will Ferrell).The Mel Brooks movie was made into a Broadway musical and this is the film version of that musical. I like a couple of the songs but it's probably better to see it on Broadway. It doesn't translate well onto the big screen. It doesn't have the energy. As for a comparison to the 1967 movie, the two leads fall short on a few areas. Nathan Lane is wonderful is his own right but he doesn't have Zero's big body and therefore is reduced in presence. Zero can command the screen just by being there. Matthew Broderick is nowhere close to Gene Wilder's high strung character. He's not a comedian like Gene. This one has its moments. But all the weird characters don't get a big laugh from me.
laversj I go to the cinema regularly; so much so that I have considered that I may be addicted to popcorn, or at the very least have an unhealthy obsession with escapism, but after countless films I have only ever genuinely wanted to walk out of the cinema on perhaps two or three occasions. One such occasion was Charlie's Angels 2. Another was this film.I haven't seen the original and though I suspect Mel Brooks probably did a sounder job, I don't think I would be brave enough to take the risk. Nor have I seen the stage show but I don't think either of these thing should matter; I 'm not passing comment on either of those works but on this piece of cinema itself as it stands alone. And it stands poorly, leaning on a crutch with a slightly seedy demeanour.So great was the impact that this film had on me that now, 9 years after having seen it, I experienced an uncomfortable flashback, resulting in cold sweats and nausea. Once they had passed I thought that it may be time to work through the past trauma and that this review may be a first step forward in doing so.I won't go into the technical details about why I did not enjoy this film because I think it is still too soon for me but I will say this: a previous review was quite accurate in their description of it being produced like a stage show not a movie; I'm not sure if this was an experiment on the part of the film makers but it felt like I was part of one and I certainly had not given my consent.I did not enjoy this film. I thought it was bad.