InspireGato Film Perfection

Sharkflei Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.

Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Leofwine_draca THE MAN INSIDE is a decent British crime thriller with enough international locations to make it feel like an epic episode of THE SAINT. It was directed by John Gilling, a usually reliable director who helmed some of Hammer's most interesting offerings in the 1960s. Nigel Patrick is cast against type as the ruthless villain of the piece, a diamond thief who thinks nothing to committing murder to achieve his ends in the film's shocking opening sequence. The chase story that follows is periodically exciting and lifted by an exemplary cast including the likes of Sid James, Donald Pleasence and Anthony Newley. Anita Ekberg props up the scenery looking impossibly voluptuous as usual, and it's great fun to see Jack Palance playing something other than the heavy.

Armand a crime film. far to be memorable, it is not bad. only version of an old recipes, with clear characters, with wise used actors in key roles. the expectations are far to be high. but the film remains decent and the story, unrealistic in essence, seems be more than nice. because if you ignore the details, nothing is too strange. Jack Palance does a good job using his simple presence. same situation - Anita Ekberg who is only the beautiful seducer with few moral fights but nothing complicated or bizarre. a film from a genre who reflects the expectations from a period. so, nothing special. but a decent crime who, far to be Hitchcock, is useful for memory. and for a kind of nostalgic entertainment.

dougdoepke A detective pursues a stolen diamond and a voluptuous mystery woman.This is a curious production that had me puzzled until I read Zipper69's informative, if dismissive, review. In my view, he's a little too negative, but the movie remains a disappointment, mainly because of the odd casting. As an actor, Jack Palance may be many good things, but a dashing leading man he's not. Plus, his performance here remains just plain weird, the southern accent about as good as mine. I'm not sure what Palance is reaching for, but the director should have exercised better control. Then there's Ekberg, the mammary goddess, who's a first-rate model, but a third-rate actress, especially as a mystery woman. Between them, they distract heavily from the story itself. Nonetheless, the plot twists with the golf ball are cleverly inventive, along with the hectic park scene with the magician and the kids. There's also some good noirish photography, but that car trapping the man in the narrow alley was a crime drama cliché even in 1958. Nonetheless, with more appropriate casting and a more engaged director, the film did have real potential. Too bad, it remains a disappointing misfire.

1bilbo I suspect that this was a "B" movie of the day. We don't have "Second feature" movies any more, nowadays we are presented with one almighty production that revolves around a single famous actor and a host of special effects.This little offering is different, there is a host of really great actors and a lot of character development. Anthony Newley is great and fits his role so well. Palance seems to be not quite with it but I have noticed this in a few of his films, his Texan accent was a mistake.It was interesting to see the change in our leading lady after she had been beaten up. Even her ample top didn't seem to be bursting at the seams!Well worth a watch - if you can get it.