The Epic of Everest

1924
7.6| 1h27m| en
Details

The official record of Mallory and Irvine's 1924 expedition. When George Mallory and Sandy Irvine attempted to reach the summit of Everest in 1924 they came closer than any previous attempt. Inspired by the work of Herbert Ponting (The Great White Silence) Captain Noel filmed in the harshest of conditions, with specially adapted equipment, to capture the drama of the fateful expedition.

Cast

Director

Producted By

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much
KnotMissPriceless Why so much hype?
Allison Davies The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
Red-Barracuda This early documentary chronicles a British funded expedition aimed at climbing the highest mountain in the world, Mount Everest, for the very first time. More specifically, this was the famous doomed expedition of 1924 where George Mallory and Andrew Irvine lost their lives somewhere just short of the summit. It remains unknown if they ever made it to the top. Mallory's body was found over seventy years later in 1999, Irvine's body has never been found, his ultimate location remaining an enduring mystery.This is one of those documentaries that you know in advance is going to end in a very bad way. The fate of the climbers is so well documented and was such big news at the time that the vast majority of people approaching this film will be only too aware of the downbeat nature this expedition ended on. The footage was taken by Captain John Noel with a hand cranked camera, which I am sure was a fairly bulky device, making it all the more impressive that this footage was shot at all considering that this heavy equipment would have to have been heaved so far up this most imposing mountain. Much of the climbing material was, by necessity, taken on a long range lens and is consequently quite limited; yet the long distance we see the climbers from gives the imagery a slightly haunting perspective. Nevertheless, there is a considerable amount of stunning photography of mountain vistas and, in general, it captures a feel of what the men saw there. In addition to this, there is some very valuable material captured of the isolated Tibetan people who live in the shadow of Everest. This was the first time they had been captured on film and so this is very nice time-capsule stuff. In fact, most of the smaller more personal details captured in the film are moments from the lives of these people, with actually very little of the climbers themselves. This is a shame, especially considering that this would be the final testament to Mallory and Irvine.As was probably unavoidable for a silent documentary it relies fairly heavily on title cards to convey information. But this is kind of what you would expect, nevertheless, it doesn't detract too much and the content generally is fascinating. Visually it has been beautifully restored by the BFI so that the imagery with its expressionistic colour tints can be appreciated in all their glory. Also pleasingly, a modern score has been composed too. For me, this is always a welcome addition to a silent film and in this case it is no different. It's a subtle minimalistic soundtrack with some live sounds added too for extra atmosphere and ambiance. On the whole, this is a very good bit of restoration work on a very fine old documentary. This is the kind of historical adventure that deserves to have some kind of visual documentation and even though we know it has a sad conclusion; it's beautiful in many ways.
Maddyclassicfilms John Noel was born in 1890 and he became fascinated by Mount Everest. In 1919, an Everest committee was formed, and in 1922 the first ever Everest expedition was set up. Noel went along and filmed not just the Mountain, but also the beauty of Tibet. Noel had difficulty developing the film on the mountain because it was so cold, but he fought against the elements to develop his film. On the expedition climbers set new altitude records, but the climbers had to turn back unable to attempt the summit. There are clips from this 1922 documentary Climbing Mount Everest shown in Battle for the Himalayas: The Fight to Film Everest. I would very much like to see the 1922 documentary it looks very impressive and it was the first time that Everest had been filmed.In 1924, Noel went back to film another expedition which everyone had high hopes for. Remembering the lessons he had learnt form the 1922 expedition, Noel bought land in Darjeeling, set up a photographic studio and sent his film to be developed there so it was unaffected by the harsh cold on the mountain. This documentary is excellent. Noel uses colour tinting, which helps make you actually feel the cold of the mountain, his film shows how big and awe inspiring Everest is to behold.Noel captures George Mallory and Andrew Irvine beginning their ascent, you see them disappear out of sight and then see a vast cloud of mist envelop the mountain. The most poignant part of the documentary sees a search party set up the signal of a cross on the side of the mountain which meant all hope was lost. It is still unknown to this day whether Mallory and Irvine reached the summit or not. Mallory's body would be discovered on Everest in 1999, Irvine's is still to be found.When they returned to Britain, Noel's documentary of the expedition was shown, but it was to become controversial because he hired Tibetan monks to perform at premieres and this offended Tibet. Their outrage meant that Britain would be denied any further access to Everest until 1933.Noel's documentary is impressive beautiful, interesting and of great historical importance for two reasons. One it is an impressive feat to have filmed on the mountain, for many people his footage was the first time they would have seen Everest. Secondly the documentary shows the ill fated Mallory and Irvine attempting their ascent.Well worth a watch for anyone interested in Mount Everest and for documentary lovers everywhere.
Douglas Skinner The other reviews of this wonderful film will give the reader more than enough motivation to watch it himself. I would like to add the point, however, that Mallory & Co. did not consider themselves to be personally superior to the natives. The film expresses a lot of respect for these hearty and isolated people, including praises for their unremitting cheerfulness towards their work. Such praises have been a part of the history of Everest exploration since that time. The Tibetan and Nepalese quite admirable. However it is probably true that Mallory and Irvine did believe they came from a more advanced society and I think that too is indisputable.We are so steeped in cultural relativism that we fail to make this distinction. It is a distinction that the natives themselves have made; as over the decades they have adopted as many innovations as have been introduced to their country. After seeing many films of Everest explorations I suspect that they have less nostalgia about their "old ways" and modes of living than many Westerners--steeped in romantic notions about the purity indigenous peoples--believe.
l_rawjalaurence Newly restored by the British Film Institute with a specially-composed score, THE EPIC OF EVEREST recounts the failed attempt to scale Mount Everest by Mallory, Irvine and their cohorts. Dating from 1924, the film offers a fascinating insight into attitudes at that time. It begins with a description of arriving in Tibet, and the filmmakers' impressions of the locals; there is a combination of strangeness and colonialism that seems typical of Britain and its people at that time. They considered themselves at once superior to yet somehow inhibited by the presence of different ways of life. As the action unfolds, however, so the tone changes, as the members of the expedition discover just how difficult the task of conquering Everest actually is. Judging from the film, their equipment was rudimentary, to say the least; the mountaineers' outfits of puttees and parkas seems more suited to the Scottish Highlands rather than the Himalayas. In the end the two brave mountaineers who made an assault on the Everest's peak fail to return: the film concludes that perhaps they were thwarted not so much by their own hubris, but by the presence of Everest itself, that resisted any attempt at colonization. This is a fascinating conclusion, perhaps suggesting a gradual dawning in the filmmakers' minds that territories (and peoples) do not automatically submit themselves to imperialist rule. Some of the photography is simply breathtaking, given the equipment available at that time. THE EPIC OF EVEREST is well worth watching as a period-piece as well as an insight into mid-Twenties attitudes and how they could be re-evaluated.