Platicsco Good story, Not enough for a whole film

MamaGravity good back-story, and good acting

JinRoz For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Robyn Sheppard For a show supposedly taking place in a deep dark cave, there's an awful lot of ambient light. The movie is gory, the plot non-existent and predictable. I'd like to have a time machine to recover the hour I wasted before I finally shut it off.

belleabu I was expecting some answers to the first movie. I loved the first movie. I don't think they even needed a part 2....but since there was one, i wanted to watch. Loved the opening scene. Would have been interesting to see the non US version opening scene. While I still think it was stupid for Sarah to go back n the caves, I see the purpose of it towards the end of the movie. Her sacrifice for the other mother.Also the final scene, huh ? Not sure how to end it though. Plenty of jump scares, gore, creepy stuff and tension makes this still a good horror flick.

jenniacochran ******Spoilers below*******The only thing that wasn't realistic in this entire cave creature movie was that old hillbilly driving the tow truck. So Sarah runs to him in the road and he stopped for her and brought her to the police/hospital yet when he sees the deputy he pushes her back into the cave hole to feed the creatures? WTF? Why not just kill sarah too or bring her back to the hole?

sukanya-samy Ya I know, I am one of those who watches movies back to back. And I am going to keep this one very short.After my pleasant (nothing pleasant about it) viewing of Descent, I watched the sequel. For people who are interested, Descent released in 2005 had 2 different endings, both quite plausible and one of them which would have shut the chapter for a sequel. But they chose the ending which opened the doors for a sequel when it wasn't required.The movie opens just 2 days after the 6 women go missing and shows the sheriff and cave explorers trying to figure out where they were. In a parallel scene, Sarah who escaped gets saved and ends up in a hospital. The movie then continues to show the stupid sheriff, about 3 explorers and Sarah back again in the same cave system from which Sarah escaped. Now if you have gone through a traumatic experience, why would you force a survivor to face the same circumstances again and if you are the survivor, why would you go into the claustrophobic setting again? I just couldn't understand it.The movie then just goes from bad to worse with the same kind of scenes, jumps and gore which wasn't even required. Sarah played by Shauna Macdonald tries her best to save the movie but is left unsupported by the stupidity of the plot and irrational sequence of events.Some movies just don't need a sequence (even if they made tonnes of money to begin with). I give this a 'C-'.