CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

jonfrum2000 I'm a fan of Zasu Pitts, so then this came up on YouTube, I jumped. Zasu doesn't show up until the second half of the film - I call that false advertising. Today's audience should not expect comedy. There are scenes that hint at mild amusement, but don't expect more. It seems as if the writers came up with scenes with comic potential, but didn't know how to pay it off. 1932 was early in the talkie era, and they just hadn't worked out timing yet. There's a lot of the talk-pause acting that made the earliest talkies stiff to later audiences. I just didn't find this movie worth finishing - even when Zasu finally made her entrance.

kidboots In 1932 this movie was called tasteless because it depicted some comical goings on at the morgue but now with films such as "Arsenic and Old Lace" and even "My Girl" it is now seen as quite restrained. For a Tiffany production, it not only boasted a book ("The Illustrious Corpse" ) by Tiffany Thayer, a popular novelist of the day ("Call Her Savage" and "Thirteen Women") but also an impeccable crew. Director H. Bruce Humberstone was given an early chance to make good and went on to have a great career ("Pin Up Girl" (1944), "Hello Frisco, Hello" (1945)). The cameraman Arthur Edeson had a list of credits that included "The Thief of Bagdad" (1924), "All Quiet on the Western Front" (1931), "Frankenstein" (1931), "The Old Dark House" (1932), "The Maltese Falcon" (1941) and "Casablanca" (1942).Funny things are happening down at the morgue - Dr. Everett (Theodore Von Eltz) has a laboratory there and is also planning to elope with Ruth (Miriam Seegar). Ruth's father, Frank Daniels (Lucian Littlefield) is not impressed and the last time Ruth sees him, he's having a "heated" discussion with Everett. The next day a corpse is bought in who is identified as Frank Daniels and the nation's police are on the look out for Everett and Ruth (who are on their honeymoon) and also Tommy, the young assistant undertaker who has taken fright and ran. Detective Brubacher (Eugene Palette) is finding the investigation tough when a wild eyed amnesiac, known as Richard Roe, wanders in and says that a murder has been committed. He was found wandering around in an overcoat and taken in at a boarding house run by Sybil (Zasu Pitts) - his odd behaviour excites police suspicion.I won't spoil the plot but certainly Theodore Von Eltz, whose forte was oily villains, must have confused audiences of the day with his portrayal of the hero. Zasu Pitts and Lucien Littlefield were the highlights, with their very distinctive humour, especially Pitts, with her fluttery mannerisms that convulsed audiences at the time - although Erich Von Stroheim called her the "ablest dramatic actress on the screen". Miriam Seegar, who at this writing is still with us, played Ruth. She was a beautiful ingenue who, unfortunately, didn't appear in any more films after the intriguing "False Faces", filmed the same year as "Strangers of the Evening". She married director Tim Whelan in 1932 and they spent most of the 30s in England, where he directed "The Mill on the Floss" (1937), "The Divorce of Lady X" (1938) and "The Thief of Bagdad" (1940).

wes-connors "Strange things are happening at the city morgue, where the body of a recently deceased man ends up disappearing. At the man's funeral, it's discovered the wrong man is buried causing even more confusion. When the deceased man suddenly turns up alive, it complicates things even further for the investigator looking into the bizarre happenings at the morgue," according to the DVD sleeve's synopsis.Much of "Strangers of the Evening" looks like it was done on one take, with no rehearsal time. It looks blocked, with director Bruce Humberstone showing competence. The performers seem to have most of their lines; but, they have not really started to act them out with each other. Lead detective Eugene Palette seems to be having trouble - at one point, he is audibly cued by another actor in the scene.** Strangers of the Evening (5/15/32) Bruce Humberstone ~ Eugene Palette, Theodore von Eltz, Zasu Pitts

adam_658 I suppose it goes without saying that 1930s America is a different culture than we live in today. The humor of this movie is incredibly foreign. For the entire movie I felt like the dumb blond who doesn't understand the jokes. The plot was complicated, but all and all pretty good. The acting is pretty decent. The fight scene is laughable, the one part of the movie where I think I understood the humor. The movie is set up as a mystery and in the good parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a suspenseful way.) And in the bad parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a confused way.) The ending does a fair job of cleaning up the confusion. If one's a fan of slap-stick comedy I would say this is probably a classic, but even as one who just don't get it I can say "Strangers of the Evening" tells a good enough story to earn a 6.