Saw VI

2009 "The game has come full circle."
6| 1h30m| R| en
Details

Special Agent Strahm is dead, and Detective Hoffman has emerged as the unchallenged successor to Jigsaw's legacy. However, when the FBI draws closer to Hoffman, he is forced to set a game into motion, and Jigsaw's grand scheme is finally understood.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated
Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
AnhartLinkin This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.
Aiden Melton The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.
a_chinn Jigsaw takes on corporate America in this sixth installment of the usually engrossing, but now fairly played out horror series. A pair of insurance executives find themselves the subject of Jigsaw's latest set of choice based Rube Goldberg torture scenarios. There's also another storyline about law enforcement trying to stop Jigsaw's games (even though Jigsaw died in "Saw 3"). The first Saw film is easily the best. That film was more of a grizzly thriller than a torture porn horror film, which the sequels quickly became. James Wan left after the first film, and Darren Lynn Bousman took over directing the next three films, which were reasonably clever and managed to continue the story without repeating themselves, but from part five on, the series began to repeat itself ad nauseam. As was with part five, the story fo part six serves only an excuse to create new elaborate torture chambers and violent traps where the characters have to repeatedly make awful no-win decisions in order to survive. As a fan of horror films, I will admit that Jigsaw's grizzly "games" hold my interest and each scenario makes me think, "what would I do in that situation?" That's the major hook for the Saw films and it still works here, but that's not really enough to justify this film's existence or the sequels that followed. Still, I suppose this is worth watching if you liked the prior films, even if it's nowhere as good.
jacobjohntaylor1 This movie is not scary. There is a short film that the first Saw is based on. Saw the short film is scary. It is 1234564324567754324565435 time better then this crap. Saw (2004) is a better movie and that was awful. Saw II is a better movie and that was awful. Saw III is a better and that was awful. Saw IV is a better movie and that was awful. Saw V is better movie and that was awful. This movie has an awful story line. It is badly edited. There dead bodies it two places at the same time. This movie has an awful ending. Do not see this movie. Do not wast your money. Do not wast your time. This movie is not for people who like real scary movie. It is for people who like to look at a lot of fake blood.
xristoff93 The first one,despite being a low budget movie was quite something.It could have been better but it got me thrilled.After that we get into a loop of decreasing quality,increasing splatter quantity and a seriously flawed plot.Many holes,too many impossible coincidences and too many inconsistensies in a wanna be consistent series of movies.The bad guy breaks his own rules(or his partners),people die whatever choice they make,so there really is no point to watch this so called righteous,yet psychopathic,teaching about appreciating life in the first place.If you like giving more than 5 hours of your life in order to see a plotlles scenario that makes people die in many different ways with a lot of blood and disgust,be my guest...Otherwise I wouldn't recommend it..Watch "seven" with morgan and brad instead or hannibal.I feel guilty even indirectly comparing these awesome movies to this one or the previous ones. Also at many points through all of the movies,except the first,there is a forced timeline manipulation just so the story makes sense....kinda makes sense I mean....Has a chance of making sense..OK it doesn't make much of a sense without tiring you a lot and leaving many holes......
BA_Harrison I found Parts II, III and IV of the Saw series increasingly tedious, so much so that I left it six years before watching Part V. I was pleasantly surprised, then, to (eventually) find that the fifth instalment marked a turning point, the plot-line becoming a bit more interesting with Agent Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) taking on the mantle of Jigsaw, the gore being even more graphic, and the makers clearly taking matters with a welcome pinch of salt (the extreme nature of some of the gruesome traps bordering on self-parody). I was having fun at last.The series continues to improve with Part VI, which develops the Hoffman character further, ladles on even more revolting splatter, and steadfastly refuses to get bogged down with trifling matters such as the cash, time, and skill required to build such amazing methods of torture. Part VI simply gets on with entertaining the fans, with a twisty-turny narrative and bucket-loads of the red stuff.This time around, Jigsaw has assembled a group of despicable life-insurance business-people, and proceeds to teach them that choosing between life and death should not be an easy decision to make. As a result, bodies are blasted, crushed, hung, and, in the film's most revolting scene, melted from the inside with a highly corrosive acid. Meanwhile, the F.B.I. are closing in on Hoffman, although Kramer's wife Jill Tuck (Betsy Russell) also has a surprise in store for the deviant agent. Rather surprisingly, this satisfyingly sick chapter has left me looking forward to more Saw.7.5/10, rounded up to 8 for IMDb.