SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie

Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

merklekranz "Rogue Force" delivers what it promises, and then some. You would be pressed to find more action per minute in a movie. While character development is minimal, obviously some thought went into the script, and that overcomes somewhat the undeveloped characters. Special mention must be made of the excellent, creative camera work, which greatly enhances the film. Michael Rooker, and Robert Patrick are both believable as the leads, while the supporting cast is merely adequate, and mostly just "cannon fodder". There are a few surprises along the way to the bang-up conclusion. If you enjoy action films, especially those with outrageous body counts, I highly recommend "Rogue Force". - MERK

briar_A As the credits rolled I sat, bewildered and a little disappointed. Rooker and Patrick are two actors who are very talented and seem to shine in supporting roles, but, boy, as soon as you make either of them the lead, watch your movie jump the tracks and burst into flames. It seemed the filmmakers took an already tired concept (ie cops who go outside the law to inflict their own brand of justice) and did not really try to go someplace new with it. If not, I ask, then what's the point? This is the worst kind of movie: mediocre. Just dead on the screen. This is one of those movies you see in the rental store, give the cover a quick glance, and keep walking. That's my advice, just keep walking.

bpress54 why do film directors always insist that actors portray fbi agents as dickheads? also, with the research facilities available to film makers, why do they make idiotic mistakes that mar their professionalism? case in point: in the court room scene where louis mandylor's trial is being held, his character is in full police uniform, including radio and sidearm. why? when the fbi guy walks out of the courtroom, he goes to a lockup to retrieve his sidearm. why was the person on trial allowed to have a gun in the courtroom but the fbi guy had to lock his up? at the scene where the fbi is preparing to storm the building where the baddies are hiding, one scene shows a cop loading the clip for his automatic weapon. that's utterly ridiculous! a cop would have his mags fully loaded before he showed up at an operation. it would be like a soldier loading his weapon at a battle.

Joseph Harder I had the misfortune of watching this film in a hotel room in Texas two nights ago. It began in seemingly promising fashion with a quote from Aristotle" the rule of law is preferable to the rule of any man', then went down from there. I counted about 17 dead in the first five minutes alone. A lot of people get killed and the f-word is used repeatedly. Worse, its used as a substitute for any writing that might be used to convey emotion.The previous reviewer had good things to say about the acting. Sorry, I could not see it. The two male leads , Patrick and Rooker, are nothing more or less than cigar store Indians with automatic weapons. Also, the sheer nihilism and cynicism of the film was profoundly depressing. ALL the (few) sympathetic characters get wasted, in gratuitously bloody fashion. Then the producers have the temerity to dedicate this rip-off to the men and women of Law enforcement! In short, I am deeply puzzled as to why the Mayor of Cleveland allowed this bloody, violent mess to be filmed in his city...the loss of the Browns must have done more harm to the City of Lights morale than I thought.