Platicsco Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Acensbart Excellent but underrated film

Logan By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

mitchapalooza85 One thousand lines to review this 'Documentary'....Garbage. Absolute Garbage. Leni Riefenstahl would have been proud of this propaganda piece. If you honestly believe this 'conspiracy' to be for real, you need to get your head checked. Conspiracies are like dot to dots, draw a line from here to here, here to here, and the next thing you've got a picture. The theorists out there think this Doco is a Picaso dot to dot, when its actually a 2 year old on sugar. A lot of sugar.The scariest part is that if you don't research this, you would easily be inclined to believe this garbage to be true. The problem is everything is WRONG. The 'facts' are wrong (wrong engine types of aircraft), the experts aren't experts (Lawyers quoted on explosives) UNCLASSIFIED papers on irrelevant information which attempt to justify the false facts Avery is about to give out. An example is when Avery chooses to show the towers coming straight down, encouraging the viewer to believe the demolition theory, when other, easily accessible footage clearly shows the towers bowing and giving way at angles. The moron makes comparisons of a B25(which he says is a B52) hitting the Empire State Building in 1945, with a fuelled a Boeing 757 hitting the trade tower. Unless you knew anything about aircraft, you'd think the priciple was the exact same. What he fails to mention is that the Boeing 757 had 200 times the kinetic energy of the B25 when it 'barely hit' the WTC Tower.I believe that all governments in the world are corrupt at least to some degree, but common sense alone runs this 'doco' into the ground. If this WAS a conspiracy, Im pretty sure that the government wouldn't slip up with things Avery is trying to claim. Thousands of people would have to be in on it. And Avery wouldn't be alive if it WAS true.Averys' smug voice throughout the movie gets very annoying, and his leading questions get rather patronising. I can tell this guy uses an Apple Mac just by the sound of his voice. Its worth a watch, for a laugh.

imdb-21872 People that disagree with this film use words like 'lies' and phrases like 'conspiracy theorists' to describe it. One even claims that this film disrespects the victims of 911! On the contrary, I believe it's those that go with the status quo and believe everything they hear in the news and everything their politicians tell them is the gospel truth, that disrespect the memory of the dead! I am not saying that this film has it all right. More questions are asked than answered, but on the whole, I believe the point of this film is to get you thinking and talking with an open mind. It asks a lot of the viewer. It's almost uncomfortable to watch because most of the points covered leave you with a reasonable doubt with regards to the official version of the events of 911. There is more to the story of 911 than we have been told, this film should leave you wanting to learn more about the truth, as long as you have an open mind and are not averse to having your preconceived ideas challenged!

dougdodge ... to think that some people just cannot accept the facts and feel so self-important that they need to satisfy their egos with asinine conspiracy theories. Screaming from the soapbox to any uneducated idiot who will listen, these morons obviously have no knowledge of the terrorist history against the U.S. during the Clinton days. This train wreck of truth admittedly started out as fiction and ends up being no less factual! One of the "writers" of this amazing and unintentional parody doesn't even believe the Apollo moon landings happened. Guess what, pal? The Holocaust was real too! This "piece" is nothing short of a national disgrace and a spit on the graves of the Americans who lost their lives that September day. If we lived in the kind of country with the government these wackos want, they would be strung up in public for treason. The clowns behind this garbage are no less terrorists than the ones who flew the planes on 9/11.

DazeBlazin The government's official version of 19 hijackers with boxcutters is totally unacceptable. No investigative expert can simply dismiss the blatant exclusion of critical evidence throughout the "9/11 Commission Report". These important omissions are listed in an intensely well-researched report titled - "The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie", by Dr. David Ray Griffin. It's available online for anyone to read through. The 9/11 commission report doesn't even mention WTC 7. Hello? Was the mysterious collapse of that building not a part of the investigation? Also, how about the fact that 6 of the hijackers have been found alive. These kids may be wrong about some of their conclusions on what actually happened, but that doesn't make the government's official version of events any more credible. At least these guys are still asking the questions that have been left unanswered. We need a new investigation NOW!