Jurassic Park III

2001 "This time, it's not just a walk in the park!"
5.9| 1h32m| PG-13| en
Details

In need of funds for research, Dr. Alan Grant accepts a large sum of money to accompany Paul and Amanda Kirby on an aerial tour of the infamous Isla Sorna. It isn't long before all hell breaks loose and the stranded wayfarers must fight for survival as a host of new -- and even more deadly -- dinosaurs try to make snacks of them.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
ActuallyGlimmer The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.
Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.
Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.
jamiepaton-33876 To put it simply, I hate Jurrassic park III. The plot is mind numbingly boring. The acting is god awful and the cgi, even for 2001 standards, is atrocious.Lets start with the plot...Why is it so boring and dumb? The whole premise is, this couples son got stuck on an island in a parachuting incident and they want to go on a dinosaur infested Island to get him back. They promise to give Alan Grant (The only good thin about this movie) a load of money to help et the boy of the island. One thing that's always bothered me is how come he wasn't eaten. The first thing that happens when his parents and Alan Grant come on the island is them getting attacked. How come this boy who has been there for quite some time has not been eaten? It makes no sense and the plot just gets worse and worseThe acting in this movie, with the exception of Sam Neil, is some of the worst ever. Téa Leoni plays Amanda Kirby and it is honestly torture to watch. Constantly over acting and screaming constantly. William H. Macy is okay but if they would've bothered to at least try and get some decent people to work on this film instead of making it for money's sake we wouldn'tall have to sit through this atrocity.I loved Jurrassic Park and I really liked The Lost World. This movie just goes to show that bringing back the main character from the first movie doesn't make the movie good. I actually prefer Kingdom of the Crystal Skull over this. No wonder Steven Spielberg didn't come back to direct this one.The writing in this movie can actually be okay at times. But for the most part it's not different it's what we have seen 100 times before. The first 20-30 minutes before they even get to the Island is more entertaining than the rest of the movie.I really wanted to love JP III but in the end I really hate it.
Mister Daniel Another fantastic addition to the Jurassic Park franchise, even though other people will disagree.. anways, Jurassic Park 3 brings Alan Grant back into the picture, who is just as amazing as he was in the first movie. This movie is once again filled with cool dino stuff, like the introduction to the Spinosaur, and the fight between him and Rexie, which both are really cool moments. More raptors incoming, including a talking one in the beginning as part of Alan's dream ( hence my title for the review), but alot of cool raptor stuff happens like Alan learning how smart they are, also a a really great Pterodactyl scene, which was really cool as well. The boat scene with the Spinosaur was really well done and really cool. Once again a really cool Jurassic Park movie.
domtaylor Director Joe Johnston took the reigns from Spielberg for this third entry into the 'Jurassic' franchise, and that meant that 'Jurassic Park III' became the worst entry in it. Although this film is more enjoyable than 'The Lost World', in its own self-aware 'B-movie' way, it isn't technically as good due to the lack of the franchise's main ingredient: Spielberg. Where 'The Lost World' surpasses this one is in Spielberg's execution of that film's action scenes. The story for this entry and the previous are about as silly as each other's and, while Johnston clearly embraced that better than Spielberg, he didn't know how to create tension or suspense in any of the action segments. Instead, they feel rather bland and, in some cases, actually rather funny, which makes this feel like a joke entry in the franchise. Even Sam Neill and Laura Dern aren't great and seem out of character, which is probably due to the screenplay and change of director rather than them. Overall, 'Jurassic Park III' is pretty bad, but at least it feels as if it knows that fact and, because of that, the audience can embrace the goofiness of it all and garner some sort of mild entertainment out of it. 5/10.
aaronogren There are a couple reasons as to why this movies deserves a far better rating than what it has received. #1 The people reviewing it expected the magic that the first movie in the sequel brought. If you remove the first two movies from your mind this movie is very high quality and definitely doesn't deserve a 1/10, like a lot of these people gave it. #2 It was a fun, action packed movie that did what it set out to do, be enjoyable. Overall, this movies was good and deserves a higher rating than what it was given. 6.8/10