Caryl
It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties. It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.
spgaze
There was earlier post stating that this was the worst film ever??? I can only assume that reviewer has only seen a handful of films. I thought this was a clever, enthralling film, it has it's flaws yes hence the 7stars not an 8 but as the film unfolds as you're watching you feel part of the process.
I would say give it a go.
a-bloomingdale327
There are a lot of moments in this movie where what the characters do doesn't make any sense and how they end up in their situation is kind of random as hell as well. But the ending of this movie in my opinion cleverly explains how and why everything happens.This movie is a "who done it" mixed with the style of classic slasher movies. At moments it does seem like you're just waiting for the next person to die so you can get on with the investigation, but the movie does have some decent moments of suspense and tension.If you like found footage movies and enjoy some mystery with your horror go ahead and give this a watch.
cambriamoore
i thought this movie was REALLY good! it kept me guessing the entire time and i didn't expect the killer to be that person. it was a very entertaining movie that will keep you on the edge of your tail. i suggest you don't eat during this movie is it is easy for you to loose your appetite. i personally really like movies about serial killers and i think this is one of my favorites. i am surprised this movie doesn't have more stars. since you don't know who the killer is it will keep you wondering the entire time and just when you think you know who the killer is you will be proved wrong. i was very close to guessing who the killer was, but it didn't fit correctly at first. there are so many close calls to finding out who the killer was, but right when it was about to be solved the killer changed. there were so many things going on that it was impossible to be bored. when i saw the ending i was shocked and i praised the killer for being so smart. i loved it! i was just looking for an okay movie to watch on Netflix, but i found a movie much better than okay. it was beyond good! i jumped a couple of times as well. i hope you can enjoy this movie as much as i did. if you do love it as much as i did than leave a comment please and give it a good rating!
suite92
The film opens to an overview of a crime scene. The visuals are impressive, in a way; that is, a lot of effort was taken to produce an amateurish result. In this director's approach, good visuals have to be accompanied by plodding boredom, while shaky cam, cell phone footage, and pixelated, blurred images are where the action and interest should be kept.We segue to a police department, where the evidence has been collected and sorted to a degree. The personnel to evaluate the evidence gets picked.The investigatory group consists of Detectives Reese and Burquez, Officer Jensen, and AV specialist Gabe Wright. They set about analysing the 'found film' from Rachel's camera, plus the visuals recorded by cell phones, plus the overviews from the beginning of the film. Close consideration yields some clues for the Detectives to pursue.Amateur director Rachel likes to film 'incredibly uncomfortable things.' Indeed. Leanne is in a troubled relationship with Tyler Norris, who is a mediocre singer and less than good guitar player. Rachel decides to film Leanne 'before she was a big star.' We also have the badness of hand-held cameras. This includes horrible framing, rotten sound leveling, extraneous sounds, and large time gaps.Rachel, Leanne, Tyler, Vicki, and a young entertainer are scheduled to take a trip to Las Vegas. Though not on the passenger manifest, Katrina gets on the tour bus as well. She has a huge amount of cash on her, and might be a fugitive. When Tyler and Rachel notice that they are on a side road, Rachel goes to talk to the driver. Things go decidedly bad after that, including the bus crashing.The film progresses to the retelling of the deaths and the unveiling of the perpetrators. How does that play out? -----Scores-----Cinematography: 4/10 Shaky camera work. Stupid framing angles. Dropped frames, severe pixelation. Insufficient light, heat-damaged memory chipsSound: 4/10 Speech is mostly comprehensible, but there is plenty of raw microphone noise, such as when cell phones are dragged on the floor while recording.Acting: 2/10 Stephen Moyer had a couple of good moments in this film; Harry Lennix is his usual reliable self.Screenplay: 0/10 After watching this, I will avoid properties directed by Olatunde Osunsanmi, or written by John Swetman. For a better film about lesbian criminals, see Breaking the Girls (2013), Monster (2003), or Bound (1996). The 'twist' at the end is cliché, done before and done better.
