Nonureva Really Surprised!

Micransix Crappy film

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Rosie Searle It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

michael-kahn718 I got suckered into watching this travesty by the cast. This movie made me not want to watch any of the cast in anything else they do. Stereotypes rule in this waste of film. Rather than being a clever satire is was a poorly executed hate film. Portraying people like Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell as such total jerks is little better than mean-spirited name calling. I really expected a modicum of cleverness from the concept but was sadly disappointed.If you haven't seen this yet, please don't waste your time!

a-m-kuhne In general, I find myself enjoying a lot of comedy movies that were critically panned (BASEketball, Freddy Got Fingered, The Greasy Strangler) and I guess you could say I'm a fan of Zucker. This does not mean that I had incredibly high hopes for this movie, but I was just hoping for a solid comedy that takes a piss on politics. The first 10 minutes were pretty good, with an incredibly funny scene where Moore is shooting a scene in Cuba where everything is obviously really bad, which he is completely oblivious to (or repressing it) describing it as a socialist paradise. However, after the opening the movie slowly started to lose me, to the point where during the last 20 minutes i sank lower and lower from my bed until I laid down on the floor. I'm from Denmark, and of course I carry some personal opinions about American politics, which most people outside America do in 2018 because of social media. But this movie is pretty damn ham-fisted with its messages. One thing is that it only shows how stupid democrats can be. That would be totally fine with me if: 1) It was clever and funny. The "left" in this movie is so obnoxious. Watching this you keep asking yourself "do people really believe that leftists acts this way?" It should have either made clever critiques at their ideology or it should have went completely funny. Instead we get a pathetic "parody" (we see the same thing with leftists making fun of right-wings) that is so out of touch with reality and just frustrates you instead of making you laugh. 2) If it wasn't so serious. If the movie just tried to be funny and absurd that would be perfect. But there are so many obvious tries at making a point or to make you feel some kind of spark of nationalism (again, I'm not from America, but I seriously don't think that many people would feel that spark by watching this movie) that it kind of ruins a lot of the "background" jokes that Zucker is so wellknown for. His style and jokes really do not fit with the way this movie is written. Instead they just feel obligatory to remind you that the movie is in fact a comedy. Still, these signature jokes are the only thing that saves this movie from being the worst thing ever and they did manage to make me laugh a couple of times. The political jokes are just plain bad.Aside from these problems the movie also suffers from bad acting, especially the lead. Farley is so incredibly annoying as Moore, but not in a good way and none of the other characters bring anything to the table. This doesn't seem like a fault of the actors but more that they didn't have anything to work with. The script is also very confusing. It could have been the fact that I just lost focus because I was so bored but I got more and more bewildered throughout the movie. The movie is of course a retelling of A Christmas Carol, but it constantly shifts between reality, dreams, past and future. I haven't read the source material so I wouldn't know to what the degree that story does the same, but in this movie I never knew what was happening. The story suddenly started to move incredibly fast, which made a lot of the scenes where Moore is confronted with what would happen if America followed his ways incredibly confusing. I had no idea what lesson he was learing or why. This could be because of the movies short running time, but I'm not sure I wished it was longer.My final problem with this movie is the message it is trying to portray. Again, if the movie went completely nuts like Team America that would be great and the jokes would land. But it doesn't. Which means you can't stop thinking about the message. I don't mind a patriotic movie, but this one is so bad at it. Do you believe that the wars in Middle Eastern countries are justified? Fine. But don't act like it isn't at least a somewhat complicated issue. This movie completely writes off anyone against war, and acts like the war against Nazi Germany is the exact same as the wars in Middle Eastern countries. There is so much more to delve into with instances like these but that would make this review even longer. Whatever you may believe you need to argue for it in a logical way and this movie doesn't do that at all.I'm kind of sad seeing that this is the last of Zucker's movies and spoof movies in general seem to have died out. This movie had some potential but it squandered it with a poor message and confusing plot which in turn ruined a lot the jokes.

bowmanblue You could be forgiven for thinking that 'Hollywood' is pretty 'left-wing' in general. Pretty much every film or TV show does tend to portray right-wing Republicans as the 'baddies' and nice, liberal Democrats as the goodies. I guess there was always going to be a film that would challenge that stereotype. I've got nothing against alternate viewpoints; it's just a shame they couldn't do it any better than this.Firstly, if you don't know who Michael Moore is (or his work in documentary film-making) you're going to struggle to 'get' most of the jokes here. He makes documentaries which mainly criticise what he sees as 'flaws' with America and the American way of life, not to mention throw in a fair few 'anti right-wing' references along the way. Therefore the central character in this film is 'Michael Malone' (subtle, huh?) – a documentary film-maker who basically looks exactly like Michael Moore and shares his liberal sensibilities. He gets recruited by foreign terrorists to produce an anti-American film for their nefarious purposes.The film probably could have worked, if it wasn't for the fact that all the jokes are largely 'personal.' Yes, Michael Moore is a large man. This means that most of the gags are based on his appearance and other problems with his physical appearance. You start being able to see them coming after a while.Leslie Nielson his also in this (although not as much as most people would like) and his small cameos are reasonably good.I watched this through and I did chuckle a few times. It's not as terrible as it could have been. It's just that its whole story is based on a political agenda and it gets a little tiring being constantly slapped in the face with the same message.If you're 'ultra liberal' you're probably going to hate this film. If you're 'ultra right-wing' you'll probably agree with certain aspects of its message, yet still find it not that funny. However, if you're left or right wing, as long as you hate Michael Moore, you'll probably love this.

rvershay2112 IMDb gave this film a 4.4 out of 10, and the few reviews I've read seemed to support this rating or even suggest that it be lowered. I give this film a solid 6 out of 10. *NEWS FLASH* I consider myself a right-winged conservative. I disagree with many ideals which the left and Michael Moore hold, but I do respect the effort they put into their work and have not let my personal prejudices impede my effort to give this film an objective review. That being said, I shall digest no further.I have seen this film three times and each viewing has been enjoyable. I would not rate this film as one of the greatest comedies of all time, but I do believe it holds its own alongside many titles of this decade. As hinted by the title, the plot applies the popular novel by Charles Dickens to relate a story based in modern-day America to present a right-wing depiction of dilemmas faced by Americans today. Popular celebrities are used to enhance this effect, with some making cameos while others are presented by character depictions (Michael Moore for instance). Using this outline the film runs smoothly as both characters and plot are clearly defined and depicted. In short, "An American Carol" is a solid film with many laughs throughout.The chief problem many reviewers have with this film lies in their inability to understand the film itself. They seem to overlook the fact that the film serves as a satire, and become offended when it portrays the left as zombies (are there zombies in the film? there may or may not be, better watch and find out). Ultimately, this film has the same effect as SNL portraying a president, or "Hot Shots Part Deux" portraying Saddam Hussein (of course Saddam didn't wear the same socks as the Wicked Witch of the East). Viewers need to realized that the film will make fun of left-wing liberals, and use outlandish examples to further certain points; yet this is the process of satire, and the viewer does not have to agree with the overarching themes to find the jokes amusing (I laugh every time Family Guy makes fun of Ronald Reagan). In closing, "An American Carol" is a good film which provides an abundance of quality jokes which most viewers would find amusing; and although it may take heat today, I honestly believe that in years to come it will serve as a classroom depiction of a common mood in America today.